Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University ; (12): 624-629, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-837877

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the mid-term outcomes of valved bovine jugular vein conduit and autologous pericardium conduit in reconstruction of right ventricular outflow tract. Methods Eighteen congenital heart disease patients were implanted with external conduits (included 11 valved bovine jugular vein conduits and 7 autologous pericardium conduits) for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction between May 2013 and Jul. 2016. There were 11 males and 7 females at age of 2-16 (5.22±4.12) years. Preoperative clinical diagnoses included pulmonary artery atresia with ventricular septal defect (n=7), double outlet of right ventricle with pulmonary stenosis (n=4), persistent truncus arteriosus (n=3), persistent truncus arteriosus with absence of right pulmonary artery (n=1), corrected transposition of great arteries with pulmonary stenosis (n=1), and transposition of great arteries with pulmonary stenosis (n=2). The perioperative status was recorded. The cardiac ultrasound and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were used to evaluate the efficacy during 4-56 months of follow-up. Results There were no perioperative deaths in the bovine jugular vein conduit group, and 2 deaths in the autologous pericardium conduit group. One died of pulmonary hypertension crisis and the other died of low cardiac output syndrome. The ratio of right ventricular pressure to radial arterial pressure, duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay after surgery were significantly lower in the bovine jugular vein conduit group than those in the autologous pericardium conduit group (all P0.05). There were no significant differences in extracorporeal circulation time, aortic cross-clamping time, transvalvular gradient in right ventricular outflow tract, blood consumption or total hospitalization costs between the two groups (all P0.05). During follow-up, there were no deaths in the two groups, no reoperations in the bovine jugular vein conduit group, and 1 case received reoperation 2 years after surgery due to severe right ventricular dysfunction in the autologous pericardium conduit group. In the bovine jugular vein conduit group, the transvalvular gradients in right ventricular outflow tract at the last follow-up and before discharge were (22.91±7.31) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and (20.45±6.70) mmHg, respectively, and the difference was not significant (P0.05). In the autologous pericardium conduit group, the transvalvular gradient in right ventricular outflow tract was (29.20±18.09) mmHg at the last follow-up and (16.14±4.02) mmHg before discharge, and the difference was significant (P0.05). At the last follow-up after surgery, there were 8 cases of mild reflux and 3 cases of moderate reflux in the bovine jugular vein conduit group, and 1 case of mild reflux, 2 cases of moderate reflux and 2 cases of severe reflux in the autologous pericardium conduit group, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P0.05). Postoperative ultrasonography showed the thickened valve leaflets with good valve movement in the bovine jugular vein conduit. No calcification, thrombosis and infective endocarditis were found in the two groups. Postoperative cardiac CTA found that there was aneurysmal dilatation in 1 middle segment and 1 proximal anastomotic stoma of the bovine jugular vein conduit group, and no dilatation in the autologous pericardium conduit group. Conclusion Domestic valved bovine jugular vein conduit is suitable for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in patients with complex congenital heart malformations. Mid-term follow-up shows that bovine jugular vein conduit has good anti-reflux performance and no severe obstruction or calcification. It is obviously superior to autologous pericardium conduit. However, some bovine jugular vein conduits have aneurysmal dilatation in mid-term follow-up, which needs to be further improved.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection ; (12): 595-601, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-708098

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the efficacy,adverse reactions and immune function of time-adjusted chemotherapy combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional chemotherapy combined with IMRT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Random number grouping method was used to divide 66 cases of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma into 2 groups,of which 36 cases in the time-adjusted chemotherapy group and 30 cases in the conventional group.Both of them received docetaxel + cisplatin + fluorouracil regimen to induce chemotherapy for 2 cycles.The time-adjusted chemotherapy group was treated with intravenous injection of electronic automatic injection pump,the conventional group was treated with conventional intravenous infusion,and both groups were treated with synchronous cisplatin combined with IMRT.Calculated survival rate was generated by Kaplan-Meier method and long-term adverse reactions was evaluated according to CTC 3.0 criteria.Results The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 86.1% and 93.3% in the time-adjusted chemotherapy group and the regular group,the 3-year progress-free survival (PFS) was 83.3% and 93.3%,the 3-year RFS was 88.5% and 93.3%,and the 3-year recurrence-free survival was 94.1% and 100% respectively with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).The dryness and hearing loss of the time-adjusted chemotherapy group had a decreasing trend compared with the conventional group.However,CD3 +,CD3 + CD4 +,CD3 + CD4 + CD8 +,and CD4 +/CD8 + of the time-adjusted chemotherapy group had an increasing trend compared with the conventional group.Conclusions Both time-adjusted chemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy combined with IMRT had comparable mid-term efficacy,but the former had lower adverse reactions,improved quality of life and immune function.Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry,ChiCTR1800016809

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL